Difference between revisions of "Terry Lavender/RATasks"

From pain-lab-grads
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Replaced content with ".")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
ADDITIONAL MISSION
+
.
−
 
 
−
Context: Norbert (Assoc. VP Research) asked me to form an Institute.
 
−
An Institute is like a Centre, but is overseen by SFU Research,
 
−
while a Centre is overseen by a Dean.
 
−
 
 
−
There are huge amts. of politics involved, so please keep
 
−
this under your hat. If, however, you find that it would be very
 
−
helpful to contact anyone you know in campus PR, maybe you
 
−
could phrase it as people we'd like to invite to the Open House?
 
−
(We would anyway.)
 
−
 
 
−
(a) Identify any potential members of an Institute re: Pain at SFU.
 
−
      NOTE: Health Sciences just unveiled a Chronic Diseases Centre (or Institute).
 
−
(b) We first have to find that document,
 
−
      which hopefully is somewhere on SFU's site.
 
−
c) Then, we need to look at any faculty member at SFU
 
−
    from any department whose work may be applicable outside of Health Sciences.
 
−
d) Then within Health Sciences.
 
−
    (Sounds crazy, but requires a FTF description.)
 
−
 
 
−
This could be someone obvious, like Ellen Balka,
 
−
does not do anything related to pain per se,
 
−
but whose research would definitely be related
 
−
(Health Comm., usability).
 
−
 
 
−
Perhaps there are faculty who deal with biofeedback (Psychology, Bio)
 
−
and Chronic Pain Sequelae (depression, insomnia, anxiety, social isolation,
 
−
drug dependency, kinesiophobia] (Kinesiology).
 
−
Maybe CS, Anthropology (of Medicine)/Ethnography,
 
−
Criminology (their addiction experts may not be focused on dependency
 
−
vs. addiction, but you never know), Philosophy, and so on.
 
−
 
 
−
This will take creative & strategic thinking, so don't be afraid
 
−
to suggest suggest people whom you think would be a longshot,
 
−
like a VR guy from Geology.
 
−
Pay particular attention to newly hired faculty (2005 onwards),
 
−
CRCs, Chairs and so on -- they have less to lose and fewer
 
−
politics, possibly.
 
−
 
 
−
There's a book of essays from Harvard Press on Pain Studies --
 
−
(Pain and Its Transformations)
 
−
it may be helpful to look at the contents page to see the potential reach,
 
−
as they include experts who range from sociology to music,
 
−
dance, ethnography, philosophy and so on.
 
−
Perhaps an ENglish Prof. who write about the body, things like that.
 
−
 
 
−
The goal is to find 5 people who will say yes, so that usually takes
 
−
10-15 people for me to contact and meet with.
 
−
 
 
−
Priority level #1
 
−
At the moment, this is the burning issue, esp finding the
 
−
Health Sciences' Chronic Diseases Centre (Institute?) document.
 
−
(Because ours can't be a big overlap.
 
−
I think they are more focused on policy & community issues tho.)
 
−
It would be great to have it for next Wed., both in email and printed out.
 
−
 
 
−
---------------------------------------------
 
−
Please also remind me to update you re: additional RA hours after
 
−
Chris and I return from the NCE GRAND meeting Feb.13th.
 
−
It is going to be very busy from then until Feb.24th, which is
 
−
when the ISEA proposal is due.
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
SPRING 2012: Main idea:
 
−
maintain social media
 
−
help w/budget stuff
 
−
help w/maintaining contact
 
−
help strategize w/issues below (that we can produce in the summer)
 
−
 
 
−
---------------------------------------------
 
−
DGr call Desiree re: paying Terry past amt.
 
−
DGr call SFU Finance re: iPad purchases
 
−
DGr review budget w/Shaw (10-20 hrs./week spring, 20+ summer)
 
−
 
 
−
Terry's estimates
 
−
5 hours a week: maintain social media in current form
 
−
+ 5 hours a week: move blogsite, create strategy for moving info to portable devices, create  fiducals
 
−
Pain Toolbox
 
−
 
 
−
NOTE: Chris takes care of most NCE GRAND budgetary things.
 
−
 
 
−
---------------------------------------------
 
−
MISSIONS
 
−
 
 
−
• Maintain social media work
 
−
 
 
−
---------------------------------------------
 
−
 
 
−
• budgetary help: DGr will locate 5 submissions
 
−
  help Dgr w/excel spreadsheet
 
−
  review NCE GRAND budget, non-salary items (travel, equipment, materials*)
 
−
  Terry can be back-up for reimbursements when DGr is out of town or unavailable
 
−
 
 
−
---------------------------------------------
 
−
 
 
−
• Pain Toolbox
 
−
  Please familiarize yourself with it
 
−
  Please check to see if Pain BC has it on their website
 
−
This is a tricky thing for 2 reasons:
 
−
1. patients are overwhelmed with info,
 
−
2. and their condition usually changes, with an emphasis from one problem to another.
 
−
 
 
−
The approach of most pain docs is to address the most current & difficult sequela -- insomnia, depression, etc.
 
−
The treatment approach is also two-fold: what the physician can do (rx, procedures) PLUS referrals to other health care professionals.
 
−
 
 
−
Currently, the Pain Toolbox is great as a resource  (think yellow pages of service providers who have been sanctioned as good ones)
 
−
BUT
 
−
it is badly designed (need 2 good undergrads to make it legibile), and
 
−
it COULD be better used as an info/educational and pain management tool.
 
−
What's missing for its use as a tool is a huge gap about how patients can USE the toolbox
 
−
other than as yellow pages.
 
−
As one baby step toward that, I wrote small paragraphs as headers for each "tool,"
 
−
so that even if patients don't need to use that tool at the moment,
 
−
they have a modicum of info about it.
 
−
 
 
−
---------------------------------------------
 
−
 
 
−
knowledge translation as an intermediary step toward greater use of technologies
 
−
I have 4 CIHR grant proposals in progress:
 
−
 
 
−
On one (UofT) -- the only one that has been decided upon (we got it!) -- I'm a "knowledge user."
 
−
    Medical researchers are very progressive I think because they tend to
 
−
    include "knowledge users" (patients, experts who aren't doctors) on their grant proposals.
 
−
On the other CIHR grant proposals, I'm a PI described as an expert in "knowledge translation."
 
−
 
 
−
Medical researchers seem to have no familiarity with the idea of design,
 
−
let alone more creative things we can do (like games, social media, robots, etc.).
 
−
    So this is an intermediary step that enables us to gain acceptance in their world,
 
−
and to be useful WHILE we educate them about what is possible.
 
−
All of the BC docs will go for more progressive ideas --
 
−
they are risk-takers (not in the sense of treating patients,
 
−
but in the sense of how to address this big, complex issue of pain management).
 
−
 
 
−
As an important part of the above, it is crucial that we stay in touch with them,
 
−
which is difficult for only me to do. Meehae is good at that, but is on leave.
 
−
I'm thinking that you and possibly Andrea would be good ambassadors too.
 
−
 
 
−
So, as part of your RA, can you please:
 
−
• keep in contact with doctors when they email us:
 
−
  Pam Squire
 
−
  Brenda Lau (Surrey Memorial)
 
−
  Linda Li (Arthritis Centre of Canada)
 
−
  Andrea Furlan (UofT, Workplace Canada, National Pain Centre)
 
−
 
 
−
and
 
−
• help facilitate the lab visit for Linda Li and Andrea Furlan.
 
−
As I mentioned, they were classmates in med school, but I don't know if they are
 
−
friends or competitors. Linda's area is MSK (Arthritis, musculo-skeletal areas),
 
−
so competition may not be an issue.
 
−
BUT
 
−
I get an undeniable sense that other PAIN BC folks are either in competition
 
−
(Ontario has hoards more funding) OR just don't think that Andrea's direction
 
−
is as important as others. For example, Andrea designed the Opioid Manager
 
−
for doctors, but the responses I get is that most doctors simply don't have the
 
−
time to use it (they have like 27 other tools, and Health Canada is forcing each
 
−
to put all of their info online, which they don't get compensated for doing,
 
−
AND they are stuck in this middle ground of treatments that are either unrecognized
 
−
or under valued by Health Canada.)
 
−
Linda Li is an incredibly quick study, values design and wants to innovate.
 
−
She has a federal chair to do so.
 
−
So it may be better to have two distinct lab visits . . . I'll talk to Linda to get a better sense.
 
−
More work, but ultimately probably better for outcomes.
 
−
 
 
−
Also, Linda Li has funding for social media for a grad student and a postdoc!
 
−
(Regularly, it seems.)
 
−
 
 
−
• UofT: keep in contact with Dr. Ron Baecker, & possibly Alison Benjamin, Jessica David
 
−
Terry, we didn't get to this one, but we are working with Baecker on
 
−
NCE GRAND things re: social media, and need to keep in touch with him.
 
−
The best approach is FTF: to actually go there, or make sure he comes to our lab when he is in town.
 
−
I'll go there in February and strategize what our next steps should be (2nd weekend in Feb.).
 
−
If you can take the subsequent visits, that would help enormously.
 
−
(Also, check out UofT's HCTP program for postdoc work.)
 
−
 
 
−
Options I discussed with him are to possibly:
 
−
a) look at Alison Benjamin's studies to see what other papers we can derive from that info
 
−
    please ask me for that tomorrow
 
−
b) I'll check with Jessica to see where her diary study is, but she doesn't want to
 
−
    "work with sick people," so it either may wither, OR we may be able to pick it up
 
−
c) doing a study using Ron's picture frame
 
−
d) conducting a study that piggybacks onto one of his -- we've been wildly productive
 
−
    in doing this (his users: dementia patients)
 
−
e) doing a design evaluation of his picture frame
 
−
    If we can figure out something that will attract his attention, we'll be golden.
 
−
    For instance, EVERYBODY loves our two papers based on Alison's studies (see CSCW this year).
 
−
    The CSCW paper is in the running for "best paper."
 
−
    In any case, starting 2 years ago, the computational conferences suddenly didn't
 
−
    ignore the issue of chronic pain, but are now interested in it. Dunno why -- may be because
 
−
    it is NOT "just" about health records.
 
−
    Please familiarize yourself with his TAGLab site (Technologies for Aging Gracefully).
 
−
    Please think about what we could do . . .
 
−
 
 
−
In general, by "staying in touch," I mean being responsive.
 
−
They are all way too overloaded to want things like tweets, feeds or general inquiries,
 
−
but I do send them a semi-annual update, esp. when we accomplish something.
 
−
I also ping them when I find a potential grant or so on.
 
−
 
 
−
---------------------------------------------
 
−
 
 
−
Help organize an NCE GRAND PI meeting
 
−
(Gromala, Shaw; Baecker, Bartram, MacLean/UBC, Carpendale/Calgary, Gardner/OCAD)
 
−
 
 
−
---------------------------------------------
 
−
 
 
−
DIscuss viability of organizing a brainstorming workshop w/ 6-8 local patients.
 
−
They are itching to help, and I'd hate to lose their interest, but we have so many other things to do,
 
−
so if we can find double-duty . . .
 
−
 
 
−
---------------------------------------------
 
−
 
 
−
Finally , if you could keep an eye out for talented undergrads, that would help --
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
I no longer have regular contact with them . . .
 
−
 
 
−
[[category: RATasks]]
 

Latest revision as of 08:12, 7 November 2014

.